Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution

Objective

The objective of this exercise is to explain the observed effects of ortho-para and meta directing substituents of electrophilic aromatic substitution in terms of the partial charge on each aromatic carbon atom.

Procedure

Use PM3 to calculate the partial charge on each unique aromatic carbon in nitrobenzene:

Use the calculated data to fill in the table below.

Position Partial Charge
Ortho -.129
Meta -.218
Para -.129

Use these results to state whether -NO2 is an ortho-para directing substituent or a meta-directing substituent for electrophilic aromatic substitution. Explain whether or not this result agrees with what you learned in organic chemistry. Use any piece of structure drawing software to draw appropriate resonance structures.

Since NO2 is an electron withdrawing group, a glance at the resonance structures shows that the positive charge becomes concentrated at the ortho-para positions. Thus these positions are deactivated towards electrophilic aromatic substitution. Hence, NO2 is a meta-director, as we all learned in organic chemistry.

Similarly, determine whether -CH3 is ortho-para directing or meta-directing substituent for electrophilic aromatic substitution. Explain whether or not this result agrees with what you learned in organic chemistry.

Position Partial Charge
Ortho -.193
Meta -.186
Para -.199

The CH3 group donates electrons to the aromatic ring due to hyperconjugation. This excess charge becomes concentrated at the ortho-para positions, as shown by the resonance structures above. Thus, these positions become activated towards electrophilic aromatic substitution, and the CH3 group is an ortho-para director, as we learned in organic chemistry.

Problem set Return to index